Wall Street Journal Profiles Kasowitz Litigation for Resolute Forest Products Versus Greenpeace

Wall Street Journal Profiles Kasowitz Litigation for Resolute Forest Products Versus Greenpeace

The Wall Street Journal in an article entitled "The Case Against Greenpeace.” The complaint includes federal racketeering claims and racketeering, trademark, defamation and tortious interference claims under Georgia law. The complaint also details how, to support its false accusations, Greenpeace has fabricated evidence and events, including, for example, staged photos falsely purporting to show Resolute logging in prohibited areas and as having harvested areas that were actually impacted by fire. 

The article noted that “it will be fascinating to track the witnesses in discovery and under oath if this case goes to trial. After Greenpeace’s long history of distortions on environmental issues, we may find out if it has any credibility left to attack.”

To view The Wall Street Journal article, please click here (subscription required).